About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İBRAHİM KALIN i.kalin@todayszaman.com Columnists

Colin Powell and the future of American multiculturalism


How much can an election reveal the deeper issues dividing a country? Certainly, the 2008 US elections are putting out so much about the vices and virtues of American society that a close examination of certain trends and discourses over the last three months can save you years of arduous study at a serious academic institution.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

This year's election is about everything: race, class, economy, foreign policy, energy, financial crisis, leadership, social mobilization, character assassination, underground networking, smear campaigns and multiculturalism. And the list goes on. While the politicians resort to all kinds of tricks to win the election (at the end of the day, even Plato would have liked to win the election!), the larger picture of an election-time nation reveals much more about that nation's hopes and fears, passions and aspirations, strengths and weaknesses.

Remember last year's elections in Turkey? What was it about? What were the issues? What were the promises? Virtually none of this is remembered now. What is remembered is the extent to which Turkish society is divided on issues, from the Kurdish problem to the European Union, from transparency to the role of religion in the Turkish public sphere. While politicians change positions on issues, the hardened positions of ordinary people remain. Radical polarizations find their way into table talks, streets and cafes, leaving a deep impact on the way people think about such thorny issues as the Kurdish problem, the new constitution, the headscarf ban, religious schools, full democracy and so on.

Now, this is what is happening in America, too. While we see some of the best aspects of American politics, we also are witnessing the worst. The Republican underground networks keep pounding Barack Obama for being a secret or former Muslim and writing and repeating loudly his middle name HUSSEIN in big letters. John McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin, accuses Obama of "palling around with home-grown American terrorists." Obama is portrayed as a security liability for America. His patriotism is questioned in the most cynical way. His skin color is not attacked, but everything else is done to depict him as a threat and danger for the future of his country. The allegation that Obama is a Muslim is touted as the best way to discredit him. McCain supporters do not realize or don't care that this line of reasoning is offensive to Muslims living in the US. Assuming Obama was a Muslim, why would that be a wrong thing in and of itself?

This is really worrying and reveals the limits of multiculturalism, at least for certain segments of American society. This disturbing reality was captured in a striking statement by former Secretary of State Colin Powell when he announced his endorsement of Obama last week. Powell's endorsement is a big boost for the Obama campaign. But the reason why Powell said he would vote for Obama is even more important and gives us some hope. Here is what Powell said:

"I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated with terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America."

Powell went on to explain why he had his moment of "enough is enough":

"I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards -- Purple Heart, Bronze Star -- showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life. Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourselves in this way. And John McCain is as nondiscriminatory as anyone I know. But I'm troubled about the fact that, within the party, we have these kinds of expressions."

This is no less than a historic statement by a major American statesman. Colin Powell is still remembered for his embarrassing presentation at the UN on the alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But I think he has given everyone something very different to be remembered by. Let's hope the future of American multiculturalism will be shaped by voices like his.

23 October 2008, Thursday
İBRAHİM KALIN
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Colin Powell and the future of American multiculturalism
  Back to square one on the Kurdish issue
  Anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim: What is the connection?
  US election: populism versus elitism?
  Turkey and transatlantic trends
  From history to realpolitik in Armenian-Turkish relations
  Turkey and NATO: Is non-alliance an option?
  World order tested in the Caucasus
  Back to the Cold War in the Caucasus
  A long dull moment in Turkey?
  A Common Word: Bearing fruit
  A new page for Turkish democracy
  ‘United States of Iran’!
  Political Islam and Muslim hip hop
  Turkey and the Middle East: What is so exciting?
  Habermas, post-secular society and Turkish secularism
  Turks are back with a little scar
  Target Iran!
  The end of the reform era in Turkey?
  AK Party and the Kurdish issue: a new beginning?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR