About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ a.bilici@todayszaman.com Columnists

Why is Russia supportive of the initiative?


A last-minute crisis that took place during the signing ceremony between Turkey and Armenia in Zurich was first said to have been resolved by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who made numerous phone calls to both parties. It later emerged that the real move that settled this crisis had come from Russia.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
According to the Russian Kommersant newspaper, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian to "sign the protocols calmly and leave."

If this is true, then this rumor has significance beyond being a simple polemic. What many have wondered since the start of the Armenian initiative is why Russia is supporting it. As a matter of fact, Armenia's normalizing ties with Turkey and Azerbaijan implies that Armenia will follow the lead of Azerbaijan and Georgia in shifting toward a pro-Western stance, thereby further isolating Russia from the region.

Moreover, Russia has been party to the Azerbaijani-Armenian dispute. While armed clashes continued between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Turkey intended to hold a military exercise near the border. But, even such a symbolic move considerably bothered Russia, which sent its chief of general staff to Yerevan to given this strongly worded message: If Turkey becomes part of the crisis, World War III will erupt.

Also, given the political and military agreements signed between the two countries as well as their historical and economic relations, it was obvious that the Kremlin had the biggest influence in Armenia. The answer a US official who knows the region well gave me a while ago when I asked him to compare the influences of Washington and Kremlin on Yerevan confirmed this argument. Indeed, he confessed that Russian influence was far greater than that of the US.

Therefore, it was evident that the key to the success of the initiative, i.e., the normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey, was Russia. Indeed, although this was not specifically stated in the protocols signed on Oct. 10 in Zurich, Armenia had to start pulling out -- though partially -- from Azerbaijani territories it had taken over in order to achieve a viable settlement. And people were intrigued by the legitimate question, "Will Russia use its influence for the sake of settlement?" This despite the fact that Turkish-Russian relations have improved considerably in recent years.

When I put this question to former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov, who had come to Turkey to promote his book "Russia and the Arabs: Behind the Scenes in the Middle East from the Cold War to the Present," he gave a considerably optimistic reply. Primakov pointed out that he does not agree with the argument that Armenia's normalizing ties with Azerbaijan and Turkey is not in the interests of Russia. "Yes, we have perfect ties with Yerevan, but our relations with Turkey are better. Turkish-Armenian tension is damaging to us. We will be considerably pleased if the dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia is settled. This is likely, though it is very hard, and we will work hard on it," he said.

This matter was also discussed at the Turkish-Russian Workshop, held by the Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research (SETA). Fatih Özbay, an associate professor at İstanbul University, replied to the question "Why should Russia support the process?” by providing three justifications: (1) The international system is in favor of a change in the status quo in the Caucasus. Russia does not want to stay outside this change. (2) Russia does not approve of Yerevan's engagement in any conflict because this may entail Russian involvement. (3) The war in Georgia has further isolated Armenia as Kremlin's strategic partner. Some relief may be provided to Yerevan via Turkey.

Azerbaijani Professor Akif Fazaliyev, associated with St. Petersburg University, also stresses this point, saying: "As a matter of fact, the existing situation is in favor of Baku. As Armenia becomes poor, Azerbaijan is growing stronger. From what I have learned from my Armenian students, the situation there is worse. Seventy percent of the population has left the country. Russia supports the process in order to prevent this country, which it had built to be against Turkey and Iran, from being weakened more." While he regards the opening of the border in return for the elimination of the occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh, the Azerbaijani professor says the Russians are masters of chess. He cautions that if any step is taken without a settlement, the Kremlin may pull Baku to its side.

Since the implementation of the protocols depends on progress to be made between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Russia remains key to a solution. Did you think that Lavrov will send Armenia a note, telling it to pull out from the occupied Azerbaijani territories?

17 October 2009, Saturday
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Comments on this article

dimitris kipouros , Oct 17 2009 12:19, Saturday
"Did you think that Lavrov will send Armenia a note, telling it to pull out from the occupied Azerbaijani territories?" ...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Why is Russia supportive of the initiative?
  Europe’s mountain censor
  From Sultanahmet to Neve Shalom
  Eruygur’s coup lessons for Honduras
  Muslim journalists wanted in Europe
  The poverty of a rich country
  Tricky part of the Armenian initiative
  Who can hold China accountable?
  Gareth’s report and the targeted NATO commander
  Kurdish issue in Iraq
  Two Turkish steps that convinced Putin
  Turkish soldiers winning hearts abroad
  New diplomacy reflected in Kuvasra
  A giant step by a strategic midget!
  Perception of AK Party in Europe: 2009 is more hopeful
  Erdoğan’s unfulfilled Diyarbakır condition
  The issue of democracy and the military in Turkey
  Does Turkey have a European spirit?
  What are the reforms waiting for?
  Germany: The Necla Kelek incident (3)
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR