About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK f.zibak@todayszaman.com Columnists

Why not discuss the Kurdish initiative on Nov. 10?


The Justice and Development Party (AK Party), which introduced an initiative this summer to solve the long-standing Kurdish problem, is preparing to bring this initiative to the floor of Parliament next week.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Since its introduction, the initiative has received mixed reactions, with its opponents seeing it as a project that will divide Turkey while its supporters hail it as the end of Turkey’s most pressing problem, the terrorism perpetrated by the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and argue that it will strengthen the feelings of solidarity and unity within the nation in addition to improving Turkish democracy. Some circles criticize the government’s plans to bring this initiative to the floor of Parliament on Nov. 10 -- the anniversary of the death of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the nation’s founder -- saying the timing may hinder peace efforts and make some think that there is a hidden message behind this move.

Milliyet’s Aslı Aydıntaşbaş considers scheduling the discussion of the Kurdish initiative in Parliament on Nov. 10 a bad move. She believes that discussing this issue, which she describes as the hottest issue in Turkey, on this day will not open the way for the peace process and will, on the contrary, close it. According to Aydıntaşbaş, discussing this issue on Nov. 10 may have a negative impact similar to the festive atmosphere that occurred during the surrender of a group of PKK members to Turkey in a bid to support the peace process last month. Back then, opponents of the initiative harshly criticized the government for failing to take the necessary measures to prevent the return of the PKK members from turning into a celebration, which very much vexed nationalist circles and the families of those killed by the PKK. “If the date is not changed, the discussion in Parliament on Nov.10 will have a similar effect on the process,” she says, adding that she is a very strong supporter of finding a solution to the Kurdish problem.

Hürriyet’s Yalçın Doğan is also against the discussion of the Kurdish initiative in Parliament on Nov. 10, saying it is a special day for Turkey because it is the anniversary of the death of Atatürk. “You [the government] have waited for months to bring this issue to the floor of Parliament. Did you select Nov. 10 because you want to send a message? Does discussing the Kurdish initiative in Parliament on the anniversary of Atatürk’s death have special meaning?” asks Doğan.

06 November 2009, Friday
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
Comments on this article

hpg , Nov 07 2009 15:44, Saturday
Well, is Atatürk a god so that the day of his death is not adequate to discuss the future of the country. However, I nev...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Why not discuss the Kurdish initiative on Nov. 10?
  The need to follow the plot to its end
  DP, ANAVATAN merger unpromising
  Why do some think Turkey has changed axis?
  What a conspiracy!
  A republic crowned with democracy
  Change obligatory for the military
  Başbuğ should keep promise
  All eyes on the General Staff
  General Staff needs to take action over plot
  No turning back from solution
  Hopes high after gesture
  Turkish-Israeli relations on track despite crisis
  Politics, not soccer, dominates Bursa match
  Hope mixed with pessimism
  Erdoğan-Baykal meeting inspires limited hope
  The Armenia deal and Turkey’s zero-problem policy
  A tough start for peace
  Baykal finally receives PM’s letter, but what now?
  How close is the DTP to a solution?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR